Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Freedom Fox's avatar

You identify a our strategic weakness problem properly. But to characterize the Sentinel as the proper solution is wishful thinking. It's a subpar, inferior weapons platform that will be obsolete the day it goes online. Susceptible to the same defensive weapons capability that Minuteman is. And those antiquated technologies you describe are actually superior to modern technologies that are hackable and neutralized without any firepower. How much of any high-tech renovation will be made in China? It's a poorly-conceived "improvement."

The weakness problem needs to be addressed with true innovation.

I'm a USAF vet, served at FE Warren when we were bringing the Peacekeeper weapons platform online in the mid-1980's. It was a gamechanger. I've been in the missile silos, the Minuteman 3 and silos retrofitted (enlarged) to hold Peacekeepers. And I've been in the LCF's that control multiple silos. Yes, the pictures in the article are barely changed from forty years ago. That's been my work, my mission.

But the Sentinel is a boondoggle in slow motion, will only line the pockets of defense contractors and construction contractors with riches as far as they eye can see and only put lipstick on a outdated technology pig. Where's true American ingenuity that changes the game when we need it?

Expand full comment
Michael J Hohnstein's avatar

Pray for Putin, freedoms last hope.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts