I don't get what all this "substack" crap is about. What's the problem with simply allowing commenting on the article itself?
Whatever. But any allegation that "anyone carrying a firearm" should be assumed to be a criminal is prima facie in violation of the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution.
Then the "carrying" public should assume the cops are out to kill them and shoot first.
I don't get what all this "substack" crap is about. What's the problem with simply allowing commenting on the article itself?
Whatever. But any allegation that "anyone carrying a firearm" should be assumed to be a criminal is prima facie in violation of the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution.
NEXT......??
We are directly commenting on the post.
FPC is going to have a field day with this.
Pigs are above the law, obviously.
More reason to carry guns.
Cop suckers disagree and submit to tyranny.