Robert Kennedy Jr Explains How Pfizer and Moderna Don't Really Own the "Vaccines"
"It's a Pentagon project."
Of all the Democrats out there who are fighting on the right side of history regarding the Covid-19 "vaccines," Robert Kennedy Jr may be the most important. He seems to be pretty much uncancellable because his assets are not beholden to Big Tech, corporate media, or the government for distribution. His efforts at Children's Health Defense are self-sustaining; he owes nobody anything.
That's why he's able to say things others simply cannot. For example, he explained to independent journalist Kim Iversen that it's the Pentagon, not Pfizer or Moderna, who is really behind the Covid-19 jabs. Watch:
.@RobertKennedyJr: The Pentagon and the National Security Agency Ran the Entire Pandemic Response
"Pfizer and Moderna don't really own those vaccines. They slap their labels on them, but it was a Pentagon project."
Full Interview: redvoicemedia.com/2023/02/how-th…
Seems important. Sound off about this in the comments.
I believe it is a DOD project, but I do not understand why the vast majority of world governments want to comply with a U.S. DOD project and why the U.S. DOD is on a mission to kill United States citizens.
The fact that it is a Pentagon project does not imply anything nefarious. Here is a scenario: DoD becomes aware of unknown pathogen spreading like wildfire in China. In the early days, no one's got a clue whether this is a Chinese military action disguised as a lab accident or a zoonotic event. Also, no one has got a clue of what the pathogen's actual CFR is. Therefore given all the unknowns, the Pentagon took the posture, rightly so, that the fast evolving situation should be treated as a national security issue and handled the whole countermeasure provisioning accordingly.
Would you expect the Pentagon to do otherwise?
And considering they can't even detect some cylindrical object with no obvious means of propulsion before it violates our airspace, should give you an idea of how clueless they must have been in late 2019 when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak got underway.
Then again, another scenario, linked to the destruction of the Georgia Guidestones, could be that it was all well planed from within the Pentagon going back 20 years or more. Here is a list of curious items upon which to build a circumstantial case:
1. Dr David Martin evidenced multiple patents filed over the years since early 2000 in relation to the C19 pathogen and related biotech.
2. Moderna has a patent on some genetic sequence found in SARS-CoV-2. When CEO Stéphane Bancel was asked about it on live TV, he adroitly sidestepped the question.
3. Then at the 2023 WEF meeting in Davos, Moderna's CEO said that they already had developed 100,000 doses of vaccine in 2019. What amazing forethought! Those guys are true geniuses. They must also have developed the first time travel machine, which is why they knew what was coming down the pike.
4. In the early 2000s in the USA, more than 20 experts in microbiology/virology were found dead in mysterious circumstances, or at least circumstances that might indicate they were purposefully created to make it appear like either suicide or death by natural causes. Needless to say, that field of study is directly relevant to biowarfare technologies. Could it be that some scientists, once they became aware of where the project was going, experienced some sort of moral awakening and had to be dealt with before they spilled the beans?
5. The infamous Georgia Guidestones were blown up in July 2022. This marks the end of their usefuleness now that the agenda has gone operational.
6. For this one, you'll have to take my word for it. Years ago, through one of my contact in the military establishment of a foreign country, I was told by this person that he had had a discussion in the late 90s/early 00s with a DoD insider (a friend of his at the time) during which the insider told him that some analysis and conclusion had been made that the planet could not sustain a global population in the billions with the same consumption patterns as North America. Therefore the model clearly indicated that a global population of 500 millions was the optimal number to achieve if consumption patterns could not be curtailed to the lowest level possible, with the catastrophic economic consequences that would unavoidably follow. When I heard the number, I took immediate notice as the implicit reference to the Georgia Guidestones was pretty obvious.
So, whoever believed this analysis correct and decided to act upon it, had two choices: Either drastically curtail consumption patterns of the first world and by extension the rest of the planet in a second phase. But since it should be obvious that that's not reasonably feasible by any stretch of the imagination--not only it would totally devastate the world economy, but go try to tell India and China, sorry guys, you gotta stop all your efforts to increase your standard of living and cap it for decades to come because, well...., because we've already overdone it, so sorry, hope you understand, and see what kind of response you'll get.
Therefore the remaining option is not to ask or negotiate, but simply go operational with the plan.
You decide which scenario is most likely.